Up
Introduction
Instructions
Abbreviations
Favorites

Full Catalog Record

« Return to Catalog

TitleDear Peter
AuthorCharles Perry
Publisher
Place
Year
Date 17/29/1976
Date 2
Publication
Volume
Issue
Page(s)
MediumLeaflet
DimensionLetter
Extent
Imprint
Collation2 sht; stapled
CatalogDR-006a/b
CollectionSOLA-x(PB)
Cit. No.
Keywords
Trans. Title
Section
Group
Sub-Group
Series
Folder
DR-006a/b
click image to enlarge
Notes
Perry’s article ("From Eternity To Here,” Rolling Stone, February 26, 1976) acknowledges the importance of the Diggers, but frames them in terms that Peter Berg may have found reductive: as theatrical provocateurs whose vision was “never consistently articulated,” whose practice of Free could be confused with welfare hustling or theft, and whose role in the Haight was tied to disorder as much as to revolutionary imagination.
Abstract
This 1976 letter from Charles Perry of Rolling Stone to Peter Berg offers a revealing glimpse into the afterlife of the Digger story, when journalists were beginning to turn the Haight-Ashbury experience into retrospective history. Perry writes after Berg apparently objected to being misrepresented in a Rolling Stone article and refused further interviews, assuring him that both the article and the book he was then writing would try to represent all points of view fairly. The letter is especially valuable because Perry names the problem at the heart of much later writing about the Diggers: without Berg’s participation, his account would have to rely on others—Jerry Garcia, Chester Anderson, Bill Graham, and material from Grogan, Coyote, or Murcott—leaving Berg’s own role in the Haight’s free institutions less fully represented. The letter also shows the tension between journalism and lived history. Perry frames his work as an effort to recover what the Diggers “were up to,” while Berg’s refusal suggests distrust of the very process by which the counterculture was being packaged for public consumption. As a Digger-related item, the letter documents not the original moment of Free, but the struggle over who would tell its story, on what terms, and with whose cooperation.
Full Text
Rolling Stone
625 Third Street San Francisco California 94107 (415) 362-4730

July 29, 1976

Dear Peter,

I’m sorry you felt misrepresented by my story in Rolling Stone. Frankly, you have nobody to blame but yourself. You were the one who refused to grant me an interview and by doing so decisively excluded your point of view.

For it was my intention with that story (as it is with the book I am writing) to treat every point of view fairly. As I mentioned to you in our conversation last year, Jann Wenner considers Chester Anderson the villain of the Haight, probably following Jerry Garcia. I talked to Anderson and concluded otherwise, as my story shows. In the case of the Diggers, I did my best to describe what they were up to, in the absence with an interview with, say, you, or Grogan, Coyote or Murcott. Inevitably part of the picture was painted by your enemies, but it was not by my choice.

Your lawyer must know that it is impossible for you to exclude yourself from my book. You will have no grounds for a charge of invasion of privacy, since you were by any standard a public figure. It makes more sense for you to reconsider your decision not to grant me an interview.

Let me suggest that you do so. I am interested in knowing what you did and when and what the Diggers were up to. This would be for a book that is going to be entirely under my control, unlike the Rolling Stone story, for which Jann insisted that I quote Jerry Garcia several times. (In fact, I will not be quoting anybody at all in the present sense. If anything appears between quote marks, it will be something said in ’65, ’66 or ’67.)

And I am interested in representing you fairly. I am not prejudiced against you — you shouldn’t read too much into that rejection slip, by the way. That was four years ago, I was working 60-hour weeks, your style is rather alien to the journalistic style of writing that is Rolling Stone’s mainstay, and I had probably taken abuse from one writer too many that day.

I should point out that everybody else will be represented as fairly as I can manage. I don’t find much in the way of villainy in the Haight until the great ripoff immigration that happened in the summer of ’67. Ordinary human foolishness in extraordinary circumstances is about as bad as I see things before then. Given the circumstances, I think Bill Graham has a point, and so do the HIP merchants, the Straight Theater people, the hobbits who avoided any activities more organized than dancing and getting stoned, and so on.

If you reconsider and are willing to tell me your side of the story, please call me here at Rolling Stone: 362-4730. I understand a free-lance researcher named Denny Eichhorn, who has offered to try to get hold of you for me, has spoken to you. If you wish to speak with him, his number is 752-4055.

Sincerely,

Charles Perry

« Return to Catalog



Large view
Mouse wheel zooms. Use the rotate buttons or press R / Shift+R. Click again or press Esc to close.
Large image
Large view
The Digger Archives is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cite As: (Courtesy of) The Digger Archives (www.diggers.org) / CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 / All other uses must receive permission.
Contact: curator at diggers dot org.